Search

Iris Martin

Bremerton, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
84 matches · 34W–50L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.74
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bremerton · 3.0
7 of 8
WA · 3.0
657 of 755

Iris is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Iris has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920202022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Iris has gone from the 10th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
43.8%
14W–18L · 48.9% of games
6.0
44.4%
16W–20L · 48.3% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 40.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history84 matches
W
Nachiko Yamamoto / Jill Tokarczyk
2025-12-07 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kay Hrdina
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katrina Fulkerson
+0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katrina Fulkerson
0.001about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Catherine Shedd / Tamra Stimach
2025-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Engelhard
+0.017better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Nachiko Yamamoto / Kimberly Karnofski
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kay Hrdina
0.035below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Debra Breen / Judy Ronning
2025-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peggy Blankenship
+0.019better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-3
W
2025-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Engelhard
+0.027better than expected — took 86% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katrina Fulkerson
+0.002about as expected — took 42% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2025-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula Frederick
0.039below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katrina Fulkerson
+0.039better than expected — took 44% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peggy Blankenship
+0.003about as expected — took 65% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Betsy Whisenhunt / Robyn Mulenga
2025-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shirley Hilt
+0.007better than expected — took 55% of games against 50% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.