← Search

Michele Brammer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rockville, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
341 matches · 260W–81L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history341 matches
L
2026-09-25 · Team 1 High Rollers · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Todd Campbell mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · Team 1 High Rollers · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Todd Campbell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-2
W
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Marek Slojewski mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Marek Slojewski mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-16 · Team 1 High Rollers · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sheikh Ahmed mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-08 · Macher - Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer McGraw
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-03 · Vissering - Grounded & Lobs · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Papadopulos
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-12-11 · Lee - Super Sac Sac · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Geppi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-11-13 · Lee - Super Sac Sac · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marek Slojewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-11-09 · Lee 40+ 9.0x · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leonard Tetteh mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-09 · Lee 40+ 9.0x · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leonard Tetteh mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-07 · Lee 40+ 9.0x · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leonard Tetteh mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams106 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level20 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 76.2% of games
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.2% of games
3.5
84.2%
16W–3L · 69% of games
4.0
91.3%
42W–4L · 67.2% of games
4.5
60.4%
32W–21L · 55.6% of games
7.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 69.4% of games
8.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 64.7% of games
2.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.9% of games
4.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 67.8% of games
4.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 60.9% of games
5.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 66.3% of games
7.5mixed
88.2%
15W–2L · 65.9% of games
8.0mixed
76.6%
36W–11L · 63.9% of games
8.5mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 58.5% of games
9.0mixed
60.3%
35W–23L · 51.6% of games
9.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
134 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
117 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
71 matches
#1 Singles
5%
16 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer