← Search

Gena Stagg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 59W–46L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history105 matches
L
2025-09-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shirley Karr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-2
W
2025-09-17 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Alpe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-09-11 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristy Maher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-09-09 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shirley Karr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-27 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Ellman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-05-01 · Jaggernauth/Lowell/Matrix · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Coppick
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-04-19 · Russell-Stagg/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Russell
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-04-16 · Russell-Stagg/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Russell
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-04-10 · Jaggernauth/Lowell/Matrix · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Mueller
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-05 · Jaggernauth/Lowell/Matrix · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Coppick
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-02 · Jaggernauth/Lowell/Matrix · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Hoffmann
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-03-27 · Russell-Stagg/Rogers/MRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi May
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2025
Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC
2025 Combo 40 & Over 5.5, 7.5 · 7.5 Women · 40+
2025
Jaggernauth/Lowell/Matrix
2025 Adult 40 & Over Spring League 2.5-4.0 · 4.0 Women · 40+
2025
Russell-Stagg/Rogers/MRC
2025 Adult 55 & Over Spring League · 4.0 Women · 55+
2025
Blackburn/Fayetteville/FAC
2022 Adult 55 & Over · 4.0 Women · 55+
2022
Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC
2022 Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women · 40+
2022
Jeter/Fayetteville/SRC
2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed · 55+
2022
Larimer/Springdale/SRC
2022 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed · 40+
2022
McClellan/Springdale/IND
2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women · 40+
2022
Redfern-Dillard/SRC
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women · 18+
2022
Russell/Rogers/FAC
2022 Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women · 55+
2022
Blackburn/Farmington/FAC
2021 Adult 55 & Over · 4.0 Women · 55+
2021
Dillard/Fayetteville/SRC
2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women · 40+
2021
Jeter/Fayetteville/SRC
2021 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed · 55+
2021
Kaderly/Farmington/FAC
2021 Interim 18 & Over · 3.75 Women · 18+
2021
Redfern-Larimer/SRC
2021 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed · 40+
2021
Russell/Fayetteville/FAC
2021 Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women · 55+
2021
Sharpe-Kern/Bentonville/SRC
2021 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women · 40+
2021
Churchill/Fayetteville/SRC
2020 Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women · 55+
2020
Dillard/Fayetteville/SRC
2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women · 18+
2020
Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC
2020 Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women · 40+
2020
Churchill/Fayetteville/SRC
2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women · 40+
2019
Deleted Players - Singles - Women
2019 Adult Singles · Deleted Players Singles - Women
2019
Meullenet
2019 Adult Singles · 3.0 Women
2019
Meullenet-Bradley/Fayetteville/SRC
2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women · 40+
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 67.5% of games
3.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 53.4% of games
3.75
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
64.5%
20W–11L · 55.9% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 48.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#1 Singles
9%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal