← Search

Tom Rocher

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
REDMOND, OR
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 11W–7L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history18 matches
W
Jim Fredericks / Christopher Graham
2024-06-22 · S OR-ACB-Hoesly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kitt Hawkins championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Allan Johnson / Dan Holmes
2024-06-21 · S OR-ACB-Hoesly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirk Candioglos championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-21 · S OR-ACB-Hoesly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirk Candioglos championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
2023-11-12 · S OR-ACB-Hoesly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Wimberly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-11-05 · S OR-ACB-Hoesly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirk Candioglos
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
W
2023-10-15 · S OR-ACB-Hoesly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirk Candioglos
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2023-10-14 · S OR-ACB-Hoesly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirk Candioglos
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-10-07 · S OR-ACB-Hoesly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirk Candioglos
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-11-05 · ACB-Hoesly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Hoesly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-10-30 · ACB-Hoesly · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Everson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-7
W
2022-10-29 · ACB-Hoesly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Hoesly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-6
L
2022-10-29 · ACB-Hoesly · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Gross
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer