← Search

Chitra Chavan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midlothian, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 54W–70L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history124 matches
W
2026-03-22 · 2 MAC - Haynes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aditya Chavan mixed
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-03-08 · 2 MAC - Haynes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bill James mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-4
W
2026-03-01 · 2 MAC - Haynes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aditya Chavan mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-01-11 · 2 MAC - Haynes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aditya Chavan mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-01-03 · 2 MAC - Haynes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aditya Chavan mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-16 · MAC - Haynes 5.5 combo mix · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lawrence Golixer mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-08 · MAC - Haynes 5.5 combo mix · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lawrence Golixer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-11-01 · MAC - Haynes 5.5 combo mix · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lawrence Golixer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-19 · MAC - Haynes 5.5 combo mix · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lawrence Golixer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-10-05 · MAC - Haynes 5.5 combo mix · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lawrence Golixer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-02 · MAC Merry Makers Bates 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruth Bates
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-22 · MAC Merry Makers Bates 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Heather Scott
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
50%
18W–18L · 51.6% of games
3.0
37%
10W–17L · 47.8% of games
6.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.6% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.6% of games
5.5mixed
44%
11W–14L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 53.9% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
33 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams