← Search

Mark Mckell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tampa, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 9W–24L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history33 matches
L
2025-10-08 · Tampa Yacht - J. Feeney · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Tilman
loading the estimate
1-5
L
2025-03-15 · Tampa Yacht - J. Feeney · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Germain
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-03-01 · Tampa Yacht - J. Feeney · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Feeney
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-02-26 · Tampa Yacht - J. Feeney · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Baker
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-08-12 · TYCC - J. Feeney · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carl Wilander
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-29 · TYCC - J. Feeney · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Baker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2023-07-22 · TYCC - J. Feeney · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Rockwood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-07-15 · TYCC - J. Feeney · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jacob Munch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2021-11-13 · TYCC - J. Feeney · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nacho La Puente
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2021-11-07 · TYCC - J. Feeney · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carlos Alfonso
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2021-10-09 · TYCC - J. Feeney · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Berling
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2021-10-02 · TYCC - J. Feeney · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Baker
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
24.1%
7W–22L · 40.6% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe