← Search

Tracy Muilenburg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
EUGENE, OR
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
54 matches · 38W–16L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history54 matches
L
2024-10-06 · ESTC-Sather · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diego Muilenburg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-10-04 · ESTC-Sather · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diego Muilenburg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-10-08 · ESTC-Sather · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diego Muilenburg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
L
2023-10-08 · ESTC-Sather · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diego Muilenburg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-10-07 · ESTC-Sather · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diego Muilenburg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2022-04-16 · 3.5 WIG Smith W18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Tinucci
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-04-06 · 4.0 WIG Dinan W40S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jama Accomazzo
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2022-03-23 · 4.0 WIG Dinan W40S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charo Deglane
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-03-16 · 4.0 WIG Dinan W40S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Smith
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2022-02-24 · 3.5 WIG Smith W18S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Tinucci
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2022-02-09 · 4.0 WIG Dinan W40S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Tinucci
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2022-02-03 · 3.5 WIG Smith W18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Gomez
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
81.6%
31W–7L · 61.2% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 45.7% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
8 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova