← Search

Bess Celio

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oak Park, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 40W–29L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history69 matches
L
2025-12-06 · NITA E 40W40d Tennis Centre Oak Park-Poe/Sujack · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-06 · CDTA E M40&O8.0 3RT Lam2 Sat 2 $27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Leonardo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-09 · CDTA E 18&OW4.0 4Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Morgan Carr
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-10-26 · NITA E 40W40d Tennis Centre Oak Park-Poe/Sujack · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marika Panton
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-10-11 · NITA E 40W40d Tennis Centre Oak Park-Poe/Sujack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Poe
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-10-10 · CDTA E 18&OW4.0 4Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lesley Seeger
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-10-05 · NITA E 40W40d Tennis Centre Oak Park-Poe/Sujack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Ledogar
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-20 · NITA S 40W40b Oak Park TC-Hennessy/Behre · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Boruff
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-4
L
2025-06-03 · NITA S 40W40b Oak Park TC-Hennessy/Behre · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-01 · NITA S 40W40b Oak Park TC-Hennessy/Behre · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Behre
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-20 · CDTA S A18W4.0 1Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elise Bergman
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-04-12 · CDTA W 40&OW4.0 7.Oak Park Sujack Sat 4 $25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Collins
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
20%
1W–4L · 48.3% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
12W–4L · 61% of games
4.0
58.1%
18W–13L · 50.4% of games
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.5% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#1 Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams