← Search

Robin Behre

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oak Park, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 25W–27L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history52 matches
W
2025-11-02 · NITA E 40W40d Tennis Centre Oak Park-Poe/Sujack · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Poe
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-05 · NITA E 40W40d Tennis Centre Oak Park-Poe/Sujack · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Hennessy
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-13 · NITA S 40W40b Oak Park TC-Hennessy/Behre · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-08 · NITA S 40W40b Oak Park TC-Hennessy/Behre · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Poe
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-5, 1-0
W
2025-06-22 · NITA S 40W40b Oak Park TC-Hennessy/Behre · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-06-18 · NITA S 40W40b Oak Park TC-Hennessy/Behre · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Poe
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-01 · NITA S 40W40b Oak Park TC-Hennessy/Behre · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bess Celio
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-05 · NITA F 75CWa Hinsdale-Scrogin · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lina Kamenev
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-09-28 · NITA F 75CWa Hinsdale-Scrogin · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lina Kamenev
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-07-21 · NITA S 45TLWb Oak Park-Behre/Myers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annette Hennessy
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-07-20 · NITA S 40W40d Oak Park-Hennessy/Block · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Boruff
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-06-30 · NITA S 45TLWb Oak Park-Behre/Myers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Poe
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 42.1% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.1% of games
4.0
56.2%
18W–14L · 50.6% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#1 Singles
23%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer