← Search

Valri Poley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sarasota, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 13W–17L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history30 matches
W
2025-03-24 · LBK Public Smith · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Lackland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-03-17 · LBK Public Smith · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annmarie Iwanicki
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-10 · LBK Public Smith · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annmarie Iwanicki
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-03-07 · LBK Public Smith · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annmarie Iwanicki
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-03-03 · LBK Public Smith · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annmarie Iwanicki
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-02-26 · LBK Public Assaly · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Assaly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-17 · LBK Public Smith · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annmarie Iwanicki
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-02-10 · LBK Public Smith · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annmarie Iwanicki
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-03 · LBK Public Smith · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Marpoe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 0-6
W
2025-01-20 · LBK Public Smith · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annmarie Iwanicki
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-01-13 · LBK Public Smith · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Stricker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-7
L
2024-03-04 · LBK Public Smith · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristy Owens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 51.9% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer