← Search

Sandra Lundin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bradenton, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 11W–8L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history19 matches
W
2026-03-23 · University Park Lundin · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Levinstim
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-09 · University Park Lundin · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Levinstim
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-02 · University Park Lundin · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Levinstim
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-23 · University Park Lundin · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Levinstim
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-02 · University Park Lundin · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Giffin
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-19 · University Park Lundin · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Levinstim
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-01-12 · University Park Lundin · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rosetta Waag
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-24 · University Park Lundin · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alison Sackley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-03-19 · University Park Lundin · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Pepin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-03-17 · University Park Lundin · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bernadette Venkataraman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-02-17 · University Park Lundin · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Levinstim
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-01-27 · University Park Lundin · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Levinstim
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 63% of the time
#3 Doubles
63%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal