← Search

Debbie Mays

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sarasota, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 67W–25L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history92 matches
L
2025-10-08 · Royal Payne · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bonita Fyala
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-24 · Royal Payne · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bonita Fyala
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-13 · Payne Park NetChix · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pamela Mousseau
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-11-07 · Payne Park NetChix · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynn Heinz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-11-06 · Payne Park NetChix · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pamela Mousseau
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-10-30 · Payne Park NetChix · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pamela Mousseau
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-03-07 · Payne Park Perhaes · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Mousseau
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-02-29 · Payne Park Perhaes · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Mousseau
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-02-08 · Payne Park Perhaes · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Mulcahy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2024-01-25 · Payne Park Perhaes · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Mulcahy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-01-18 · Payne Park Perhaes · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Mulcahy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-01-11 · Payne Park Perhaes · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynn Heinz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
92.3%
24W–2L · 72.5% of games
7.0
95.5%
21W–1L · 65.6% of games
7.5
47.4%
18W–20L · 48.1% of games
8.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal