← Search

Kim Clearkin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Claymont, DE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 119W–98L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history217 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Notorious K.I.M. · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dinali Jayanetti
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-3
W
2026-08-06 · Mid-Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Zecca
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-08-04 · Senior Smash · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patti Berk
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · Notorious K.I.M. · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Grasso
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · Slicing Shots · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nan Barash
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-06 · Notorious 40 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Kim
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · Notorious 40 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jannie Lau
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · Notorious 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emma Collina
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · Senior Smash · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Querey
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · Notorious K.I.M. · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen Patane
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · Notorious 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcia Keld
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-03 · Notorious K.I.M. · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen Patane
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
78.6%
44W–12L · 63.6% of games
4.0
42.1%
24W–33L · 48.4% of games
7.0
60%
9W–6L · 59.3% of games
8.0
25%
5W–15L · 42.9% of games
7.0mixed
65%
26W–14L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
9W–18L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
40 matches
#1 Singles
9%
19 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova