Search

Chad Masche

Snohomish, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
51 matches · 27W–24L · seasons 20212026
Where Chad sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Chad is one of 856 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chad has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Chad has gone from the 12th to the 29th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
100%
13W–0L · 63% of games
4.5
33.3%
7W–14L · 43.4% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 42.9% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history51 matches
W
Christopher Cahoon / Sean Kelly
2026-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Schmidt
+0.033better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-01-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Bibbs
0.013about as expected — took 71% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
David Lam / Bofan Hsu
2025-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lohit Verma
0.050below expectation — took 44% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lohit Verma
+0.038better than expected — took 92% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Ryan Cooper / Mark Gustinis
2025-01-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lohit Verma
+0.026better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phu Ngo
0.046below expectation — took 53% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Hrishi Talwar / Mark Dubinchamps
2024-10-26 · #3 Doubles · with David Bibbs
+0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Raymund Ypon / George Byrdchamps
2024-10-25 · #2 Doubles · with Will Blanchard
0.038below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Brad Stoll / James Cooperchamps
2024-10-25 · #1 Doubles · with Kevin Schmidt
+0.013better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2024-08-25 · #3 Doubles · with Kevin Schmidt
0.030below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-08-24 · #2 Doubles · with Will Blanchard
+0.035better than expected — took 92% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Thomas Jordan / Joe Potterchamps
2024-08-24 · #3 Doubles · with Simran Dhindsa
+0.009better than expected — took 86% of games against 70% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.