← Search

Ellen Lotz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bradenton, FL
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
14 matches · 7W–7L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history14 matches
W
2026-10-23 · The Lake Club 55 Armiak · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Lenart-Costellone
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-10-03 · Payne Park Narwhals · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Barbara Prince
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-28 · Payne Park Narwhals · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Barbara Prince
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2021-03-24 · Rosedale Frazier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
W
2021-03-10 · Rosedale Frazier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maggie Taylor
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2021-02-18 · Rosedale Frazier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Fatzinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2021-02-10 · Rosedale Frazier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Helton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2021-02-03 · Rosedale Frazier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Helton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
L
2021-01-27 · Rosedale Frazier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maggie Taylor
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
W
2021-01-20 · Rosedale Frazier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maggie Taylor
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2020-12-16 · Rosedale Frazier · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Linda Frazier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2020-10-28 · Rosedale Frazier · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carol Helton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.3% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 64% of the time
#3 Doubles
64%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer