← Search

Erin Kramer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 84W–66L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history150 matches
W
2026-10-17 · CC Avila Gordon · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrew Sharp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-10-11 · #1 Doubles · with Kirk Vaughn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-09-05 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-2
L
2026-06-07 · CDTA S M18&O9.0 3.Lake Chang Sun 7 $26 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andre Gagnon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · CDTA S 18&OW4.5 2.Wilm Burns Sun 3 $20 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elaine Ni
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-5
L
2026-05-17 · CDTA S 18&OW4.5 2.Wilm Burns Sun 3 $20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashley Martin
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · CDTA S M18&O9.0 3.Lake Chang Sun 7 $26 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andre Gagnon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · CDTA W 40&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sat 5 $20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Meade
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · CDTA W 18&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sun 3 $20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashley Martin
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-2
W
2026-04-26 · CDTA W M18&O9.0 2.Lake Chang Sun 7 $26 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andre Gagnon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-4
W
2026-04-19 · CDTA W TriWMid 3.Gnvw Baltazaar Sat 3 $21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Campanelli
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-4
W
2026-04-12 · CDTA W 18&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sun 3 $20 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Meade
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 49% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
44%
11W–14L · 53.5% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 55.7% of games
10.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 66% of games
7.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.2% of games
8.0mixed
70%
14W–6L · 59.1% of games
8.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.2% of games
9.0mixed
47.6%
20W–22L · 50.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
33 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer