← Search

Justin Booms

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
205 matches · 134W–71L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history205 matches
W
2026-10-25 · CHI E 18M4.0 8.RT Rus Sun 4 $29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hazem Isawi
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-17 · CHI E 18M4.0 8.RT Rus Sun 4 $29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Simon Abraham
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-25 · CDTA W M18&O7.0 4.McFet Baltazar Fri 8 $25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Gross mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · CDTA W M18&O7.0 4.McFet Baltazar Fri 8 $25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Gross mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · CDTA W M18&O7.0 4.McFet Baltazar Fri 8 $25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Gross mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tomomi Nagao mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tomomi Nagao mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sammy Hong championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · CDTA S 18&OM4.0 4.RT Ciuca Fri 7 $27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Simon Abraham
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-4, 1-0
W
Default
2026-07-12 · CDTA S M18&O8.0 1.Tam Wright Tue 7 $22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Huan Chang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · CDTA S 18&OM4.0 4.RT Ciuca Fri 7 $27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Igor Gogov
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-02 · CDTA S M18&O8.0 1.Tam Wright Tue 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Claudia Ma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.2% of games
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 63.2% of games
3.5
68.8%
22W–10L · 56% of games
4.0
70.4%
19W–8L · 57.3% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 48.4% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75.7%
28W–9L · 58.9% of games
7.5mixed
50%
12W–12L · 51.3% of games
8.0mixed
63%
17W–10L · 54.6% of games
8.5mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 53.8% of games
9.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
46 matches
#1 Singles
9%
19 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova