← Search

JB Henriksen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Salt Lake City, UT
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 8W–14L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history22 matches
L
2024-06-26 · Liberty Park Tennis-Bird/Gillaspy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Phillip Gillaspy
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-05 · Liberty Park Tennis-Bird/Gillaspy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Curt Howes
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-01 · Liberty Park Tennis-Bird/Gillaspy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Bossart
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-03-23 · Cottonwood Club-Nash · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vivek Reddy
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-05-10 · Liberty Park Tennis-Bird · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Bossart
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-05-03 · Liberty Park Tennis-Bird · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Nielson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2023-02-10 · Cottonwood Club-Littleford · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kumru Uruk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-01-27 · Cottonwood Club-Littleford · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lois Peterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2022-10-15 · Cottonwood Club-Nash · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trevor Clements
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2022-09-17 · Cottonwood Club-Nash · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Rossi
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2022-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Atkin
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2022-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Doe
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 47.8% of games
8.0
25%
3W–9L · 42% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova