Search

Dan Blaker

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
81 matches · 34W–47L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
58%
stay 3.0
42%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 88% stay · 12% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.91. Lower than today’s 2.98 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
88 of 357
OR · 3.0
144 of 600

Dan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
MPRC-Todd/Cuenco
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men
2026
MPRC-Agnihotri/Davis
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2026
MPRC-Alfonso/Tompkins
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2026
MPRC-Davis
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2025
MPRC-Alfonso/Bakhtiar
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2025
MPRC-Blaker
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dan has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Dan has gone from the 90th to the 31st percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
46.3%
25W–29L · 50.3% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 36.6% of games
6.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history81 matches
W
Eric Shoemaker
2026-07-23 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.021better than expected — took 86% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-20 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.016below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Davis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noah Davis
+0.067better than expected — took 92% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Davis · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.049better than expected — took 29% of games against 19% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Nathaniel Post
2026-03-29 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Davis · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.010below expectation — took 14% of games against 30% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · MPRC-Todd/Cuenco · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with William Schreiber
+0.043better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-02-20 · MPRC-Todd/Cuenco · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mitchell Todd
0.016below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
John LEONIDAS
2026-02-07 · MPRC-Todd/Cuenco · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.043below expectation — took 33% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-18 · MPRC-Todd/Cuenco · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mahesh Bhat
0.003about as expected — took 46% of games against 47% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-11 · MPRC-Todd/Cuenco · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.046below expectation — took 57% of games against 71% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Sumanth Krishnamurthy
2025-12-22 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.027better than expected — took 86% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Zhenxin Zhong
2025-12-21 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.021better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.