Search

Matthew Seibt

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2024
11 matches · 5W–6L · seasons 20222024
Where Matthew sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Matthew is one of 683 men at 3.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 23% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams4 teams · 2022–2024
MPRC-Alfonso/Wolff
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2024
MPRC-Blaker/Tilley
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2024
MPRC-Blaker
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2023
MPRC-Agnihotri
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matthew has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022, 2023, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
50%
5W–5L · 48.9% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history11 matches
L
2024-03-02 · MPRC-Blaker/Tilley · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Christopher Graham / Zachary Wright
2024-01-28 · MPRC-Alfonso/Wolff · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Ayers
+0.050better than expected — took 40% of games against 25% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-01-21 · MPRC-Blaker/Tilley · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.018better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-03-11 · MPRC-Blaker · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Noah Davis
+0.031better than expected — took 62% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Skip Potter / Christopher Bailey
2023-02-25 · MPRC-Blaker · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joshua Slate
+0.030better than expected — took 65% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Satya A / Raghavan Kumar
2023-02-11 · MPRC-Blaker · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Kaye
0.027below expectation — took 35% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2023-01-15 · MPRC-Blaker · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fayaz Shaikh
+0.067better than expected — took 75% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2022-02-20 · MPRC-Agnihotri · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dan Blaker
+0.008better than expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
ALFREDO ALANIS / Rodrigo Martinez
2022-01-23 · MPRC-Agnihotri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christian Paulsen
0.040below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2022-01-14 · MPRC-Agnihotri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tom Finnerty
+0.004about as expected — took 54% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-01-08 · MPRC-Agnihotri · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tom Finnerty
+0.001about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.