← Search

Karthik Nayani

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Farmington, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 86W–25L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history111 matches
L
2026-09-22 · Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Roberson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-21 · Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Roberson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-31 · Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Wesley Garner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-25 · Lundstrum-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trevor Mallioux championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · Lundstrum-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trevor Mallioux championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-24 · Lundstrum-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trevor Mallioux championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · Lundstrum-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trevor Mallioux championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · Tevonian/Bentonville/IND · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Earhart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-10 · Tevonian/Bentonville/IND · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Casey Tevonian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · Buescher-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Larimer championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-14 · Buescher-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Larimer championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · Buescher-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Sam championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
89.7%
26W–3L · 64.6% of games
4.0
84.1%
37W–7L · 60.7% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 61.3% of games
7.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 57.2% of games
8.5
20%
1W–4L · 44% of games
4.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 47.4% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#2 Singles
12%
13 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer