← Search

Eileen Smith

— year-end
62 matches · 43W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Eileen Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Davis/Neal/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alexandra Neff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-26 · Davis/Neal/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marjorie George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · Deuce Bags · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JULIE GONTAREK
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-18 · Talbert/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Talbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-08-18 · Davis/Neal/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathy Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · Talbert/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Talbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-03 · Gontarek/Cox/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Frankel Nau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-28 · Talbert/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Angus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-27 · Gontarek/Cox/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · Davis/Neal/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathy Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-23 · Deuce Bags · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Galloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Maryam Khan / Jennifer Thomas
2026-07-13 · Davis/Neal/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Bernstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams33 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 61.9% of games
3.5
67.9%
19W–9L · 59.3% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.1% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
18 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer