← Search

Mary Lewis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oxford, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 6W–11L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history17 matches
L
2026-10-10 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Mazur
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-24 · PEACH-Mazur 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brandon Fitch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-17 · PEACH-Mazur 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Nellis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-19 · PEACH-Mazur 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Nellis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-17 · 5PEACH-RUSU 70DW TH 55&O SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Severyn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-07-10 · 5PEACH-RUSU 70DW TH 55&O SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Swiderski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-05-22 · 5PEACH-RUSU 70DW TH 55&O SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Rusu
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-24 · 5PEACH-MAZUR AD18&O MO 35NW SEM F5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Fitch
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-10 · 5PEACH-MAZUR AD18&O MO 35NW SEM F5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gigi Oleson
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2023-06-26 · 5PEACH-MAZUR AD18&O MO 35NW SEM F5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gigi Oleson
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-15 · 5PEACH-MAZUR AD18&O MO 35NW SEM F5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fran Masters
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2022-06-13 · 2PEACH-MAZUR 35NW 18&O AD MON SEM F5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fran Masters
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 37.5% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal