← Search

Hania Younis

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
81 matches · 45W–36L · seasons 2022–2024
Where Hania sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Hania is one of 1627 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 67% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Hania has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Hania has gone from the 8th to the 60th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
57.1%
24W–18L · 55% of games
3.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 50.6% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 64.5% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history81 matches
W
2024-05-31 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.018better than expected — took 92% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Anna Volkov
2024-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.033below expectation — took 44% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Ting Tseng
2024-05-27 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.040below expectation — took 62% of games against 72% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2024-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.064better than expected — took 80% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Laurie Gerson
2024-05-15 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.003better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-05-14 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.001better than expected — took 71% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Kate Gilham / Veronica Golden
2024-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Apfel
−0.007about as expected — took 71% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-05-02 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.016about as expected — took 29% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-05-01 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.015better than expected — took 63% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-04-25 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.003about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-04-23 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.056below expectation — took 48% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Rachel Wang
2024-04-19 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.038below expectation — took 57% of games against 69% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.