← Search

Caroline Harris

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 23W–8L · seasons 2022–2025
Match history31 matches
W
2025-02-01 · LA - WC Queen Anne 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Kariuki
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-09-29 · LA-LLW-Queen Anne 3.5W-Brittany Blackie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Takeuchi
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-09-22 · LA-LLW-Queen Anne 3.5W-Brittany Blackie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eriana Blankinship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-09-15 · LA - Queen Anne TRI W 2.5-3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bethany Fenton
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-08-04 · LA - Queen Anne TRI W 2.5-3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Giordano
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-5
L
2024-07-21 · LA - Queen Anne TRI W 2.5-3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Takeuchi
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-06-02 · LA-LLW-Queen Anne 3.5W-Brittany Blackie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meriem Romeo
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2024-06-01 · LA-LLW-Queen Anne 3.5W-Brittany Blackie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Chow
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2024-05-19 · LA-LLW-Queen Anne 3.5W-Brittany Blackie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meriem Romeo
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2023-10-28 · LA - Queen Anne 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cinderella Gatcheco
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2023-10-01 · LA - Queen Anne 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cinderella Gatcheco
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-09-24 · LA-LLW-Queen Anne-Diana Chow · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittany Blackie
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 62.1% of games
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 50.6% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#1 Singles
23%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams