← Search

Kathleen McAneany

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 21W–21L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history42 matches
L
2026-06-07 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elisabeth Caplan
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maura Leone
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-12 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ahern
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ahern
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-03-22 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ahern
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-15 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elisabeth Caplan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-08 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ahern
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-01 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Gladney
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-07 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ahern
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-16 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alara Godbout
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-15 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elisabeth Caplan
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-19 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marci Palluzzi
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
3.0
50%
21W–21L · 50.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 64% of the time
#3 Doubles
64%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#1 Singles
12%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer