← Search

Karen Ahern

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, CT
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 7W–32L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history39 matches
L
2026-10-25 · MAD: Mad Racquets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eleanor Reid
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-18 · MAD: Mad Racquets: Fagerquist/ · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Beth Zemetis
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-10-04 · MAD: Mad Racquets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanne Kadziela
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-03 · MAD: Mad Racquets: Fagerquist/ · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sheri Orr
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Raubenstine
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-19 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elisabeth Caplan
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Purgatorio
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7
W
2026-04-12 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen McAneany
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen McAneany
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-03-22 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen McAneany
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-15 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Raubenstine
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-08 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen McAneany
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
18.9%
7W–30L · 36.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
17 matches
#1 Singles
41%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert