← Search

Amanda Raubenstine

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Higganum, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 6W–13L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history19 matches
L
2026-06-14 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ahern
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-19 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Purgatorio
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-22 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-15 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ahern
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-08 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-01 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ahern
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elisabeth Caplan
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-04 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ahern
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-16 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-15 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-12 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ahern
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-05-31 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
3.0
31.6%
6W–13L · 37.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
10 matches
#1 Singles
37%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer