← Search

Elisabeth Caplan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Northford, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 17W–45L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history62 matches
L
2026-10-04 · MAD: Mad Racquets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Buonocore
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maura Leone
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-07 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen McAneany
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-19 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ahern
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maura Leone
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-15 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen McAneany
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-08 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marie Mozzi
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-02-07 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Raubenstine
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maura Leone
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-06 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ahern
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-15 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen McAneany
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-02 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maura Leone
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
25.9%
14W–40L · 41.3% of games
6.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#1 Singles
29%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal