← Search

Robert Peha

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mercer Island, WA
2.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
10 matches · 1W–9L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history10 matches
L
2026-02-08 · MI-Aces Up-Chang · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with David Vavrichek
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-24 · MI-Aces Up-Chang · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Bryn Peterson
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-01-23 · MI-Aces Up-Chang · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Bryn Peterson
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-25 · MI-Double Trouble-Chang · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kelly Richards mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-10-19 · MI-Double Trouble-Chang · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Donna Peha mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-10-03 · MI-Double Trouble-Chang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Peha mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-03 · MI-Double Trouble-Chang · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Diane Demopulos mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-06-22 · MI-Double Trouble-Chang · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Donna Peha mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-21 · MI-Top Guns-Knievel · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brian Eskridge
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-03-29 · MI-Top Guns-Knievel · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michael Brick
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–5L · 31.8% of games
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert