← Search

Brian Oelbermann

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fresno, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 46W–40L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history86 matches
W
2026-11-02 · CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS CM7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Brand
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-10-26 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS CM8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jon Kubar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-11 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS CM8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jose Calderon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-07 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS CM8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jon Kubar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS CM7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steven Chin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ramyar Moghaddam
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Solaegui
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harmeet Riyar
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-20 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seth Moranda
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-06 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristhian Nagel
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Solaegui
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-08 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harmeet Riyar
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
81.6%
31W–7L · 64% of games
4.0
12%
3W–22L · 38.6% of games
7.5
55%
11W–9L · 52.3% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova