← Search

Jon Kubar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fresno, CA
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 45W–70L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history115 matches
L
2026-10-26 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS CM8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Oelbermann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-15 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS CM8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ethan Cardot
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-03 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS CM8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Chin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-21 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS CM8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Warren Valdeabella
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-07 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS CM8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Oelbermann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-15 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Cortina championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Raul Arellano championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-14 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Contente championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 55AM8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Brand championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-11 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 55AM8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Carlson championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Contente championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-26 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Severino Lozano
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
25.9%
14W–40L · 42.7% of games
8.0
75%
6W–2L · 53% of games
8.5
33.3%
7W–14L · 42.2% of games
8.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 56.1% of games
9.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams