← Search

Jade Yang

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fresno, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 47W–17L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history64 matches
W
2026-11-01 · CLOVIS EAST HS CM8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nickson Aninon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-10-26 · CLOVIS EAST HS CM8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nickson Aninon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-10-12 · CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS CM7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mauricio Ramos
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS CM7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Timothy Parker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-21 · CLOVIS EAST HS CM8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ardavan Kheradpir
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-09-02 · CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS CM7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Kent
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-15 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Palomera championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-15 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Palomera championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Palomera championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AM4.0A · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-03 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AM4.0A · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS EAST HS 18AM4.5A · #2 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
68%
17W–8L · 51.6% of games
4.5
50%
4W–4L · 42% of games
7.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 64% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 65.3% of games
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#1 Singles
8%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer