← Search

Megan Prine

Redmond, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 23W–29L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Megan Prine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-07-30 · Sorry, Not Sorry · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · Sorry, Not Sorry · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Feder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · WSC-Old School Slicers-Borner · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amol Hanwante mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-22 · Sorry, Not Sorry · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Lieb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-24 · ETC-3.0W-Box · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Borner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · ETC-3.0W-Box · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Stroh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-25 · ETC-3.0W-Box · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Borner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-12 · ETC-3.0W-Box · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Stroh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-04 · ETC-3.0W-Box · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Feder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-15 · ETC-Box 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Feder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-02-07 · ETC-Box 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Feder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-01-23 · ETC-Box 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elnaz Ansari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
37.1%
13W–22L · 47% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert