← Search

Morgan Qubein

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
High Point, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 44W–18L · seasons 2024–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-10-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bridget Gislimberti championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-09-22 · Marus 4.0W Fall Singles Tues AM · #3 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-27 · Isner/Strassell 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cj Isner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-13 · Isner/Strassell 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Layne Saunders
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-11 · Marus 4.0W Fall Singles Tues AM · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PM · #3 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-08 · Knight 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Campbell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
Default
2026-06-17 · Knight 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Campbell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-16 · Driscoll 18s 3.5W Singles Tues AM · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · Howell 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Mickleberry
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-11 · Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PM · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-20 · Knight 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Campbell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
21W–7L · 59.7% of games
4.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 54.5% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 64.8% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.1% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 23% of the time
#1 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#1 Singles
19%
12 matches
#2 Singles
16%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#3 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams