← Search

Hayward Reed

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 34W–33L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Hayward Reed to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-09-12 · CGM-Szueber/Reed · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chuck Lantz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-04-28 · CGM-Reed/Logan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Tippets
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-04-14 · CGM-Reed/Logan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-04-10 · CGM-Reed/Logan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-24 · CGM-Reed/Logan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Wallin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-03-11 · CGM-Reed/Logan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimbal Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-23 · CGM-Logan/Reed · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Richard Tippets
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2024-08-09 · CGM-Logan/Reed · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Don Dowling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-07-15 · CGM-Logan/Reed · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Richard Tippets
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Anthony Webb / Peter Vogl
2024-07-11 · CGM-Logan/Reed · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Richard Tippets
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-06-28 · CGM-Logan/Reed · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Bill Swift
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-17 · CGM-Reed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimbal Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
80%
8W–2L · 64.5% of games
3.5
50%
14W–14L · 49.3% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
46.2%
12W–14L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#2 Singles
10%
7 matches
#1 Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe