← Search

Michael Phelipa

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Melbourne, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
206 matches · 131W–75L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history206 matches
W
2026-10-29 · EFSC - Flores · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jason Abbott
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-15 · EFSC - Flores · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nathan Hartnett
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-10-14 · EFSC - Flores · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jason Abbott
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-09-24 · EFSC - Flores · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elliott Hulscher
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-17 · EFSC - Flores · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with William Honaker
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-29 · EFSC - Carazo · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Flores
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · Brevard/Flores · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Martise championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
Default
2026-08-22 · EFSC - Carazo · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Flores
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-22 · Brevard/Flores · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Martise championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · EFSC - Carazo · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emilio Ampuero
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · EFSC - Carazo · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emilio Ampuero
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-28 · EFSC - Carazo · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Flores
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
60.5%
46W–30L · 54.9% of games
5.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.4% of games
8.0
100%
7W–0L · 67.7% of games
8.5
71.9%
46W–18L · 56.3% of games
10.0mixed
31.6%
6W–13L · 46.5% of games
9.0mixed
67.9%
19W–9L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams