← Search

Daniel Flores

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Melbourne, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
263 matches · 200W–63L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history263 matches
L
2026-09-26 · Brevard/Flores · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Devereaux mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-26 · Brevard/Flores · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Senta Melvin mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7
L
2026-09-25 · Brevard/Reich · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marina Svyatnenko mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-25 · Brevard/Reich · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marina Svyatnenko mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · EFSC - Carazo · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Phelipa
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-27 · EFSC - Flores · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with William Honaker
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · Brevard/Flores · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zachary Eichholz championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
Default
2026-08-22 · EFSC - Carazo · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Phelipa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-13 · EFSC - Flores · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Trey Crowley
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · EFSC - Carazo · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Phelipa
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · Brevard/Flores · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Devereaux mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · Brevard/Flores · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Senta Melvin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
10.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.5% of games
3.0
85%
17W–3L · 65.8% of games
3.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 61.2% of games
4.0
80%
40W–10L · 63.1% of games
4.5
69.7%
23W–10L · 60.8% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 80.3% of games
7.5
89.7%
26W–3L · 65.5% of games
8.5
83.3%
25W–5L · 61.5% of games
9.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 58.4% of games
4.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
65.9%
27W–14L · 58.8% of games
9.0mixed
59.1%
13W–9L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
49 matches
#1 Male Doubles
4%
11 matches
#1 Singles
4%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King