← Search

Frank Figueroa

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
20 matches · 10W–10L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history20 matches
L
2026-04-11 · 8.0 CTC The Brotherhood M65S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Shol
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-03-21 · 8.0 CTC The Brotherhood M65S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Mervis
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-02-28 · 8.0 CTC The Brotherhood M65S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Mervis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-03-24 · 8.0 PTC Old Time Winners M65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Bowles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2023-03-17 · 8.0 PTC Old Time Winners M65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Twitchell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2023-03-10 · 8.0 PTC Old Time Winners M65S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Twitchell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2023-03-10 · 8.0 PTC Old Time Winners M65S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Twitchell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-03-04 · 8.0 PTC Lapane M65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bennet Serkin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
L
2022-03-04 · 8.0 PTC Lapane M65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Kroelinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2021-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Romey Glenn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2021-02-06 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Romey Glenn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2021-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Romey Glenn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
8.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 51.6% of games
9.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe