← Search

Chacho Romero

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 2W–12L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history14 matches
L
2024-04-19 · 8.0 PTC Mandel M65S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Daniel Hopkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-04-05 · 8.0 PTC Mandel M65S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Shum
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeff Craig
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2021-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Whinery
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2021-01-09 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark Skelte
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2020-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Linscott
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2020-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Randolph Beerman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2020-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Randolph Beerman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2019-07-27 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2019-03-03 · The Rippers · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joseph Rogers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2019-02-24 · The Rippers · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Eduardo Vegas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2019-02-16 · The Rippers · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Condes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
3 matches
Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal