← Search

Lindsay Benton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chapel Hill, NC
4.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
14 matches · 9W–5L · seasons 2019–2022
Match history14 matches
W
2022-08-10 · 3-MScurtu-HS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Parker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-07-31 · 3-MScurtu-HS · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Parker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-06-30 · 3-MScurtu-HS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susana Harvey mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2022-06-21 · 3-MScurtu-HS · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Newell mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2021-07-31 · *3 ENDR Servivors · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Parker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2021-06-12 · 3. TOC.DRAUGHON · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Parker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2021-05-27 · *3 ENDR Servivors · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanne McCallie mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2019-07-30 · *5 EGEN Croas · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanne McCallie mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2019-07-23 · *5 EGEN Croas · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara St Clair mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2019-07-18 · *3 ENDR Servivors · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Draughon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2019-07-16 · *5 EGEN Croas · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanne McCallie mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
L
2019-07-02 · *5 EGEN Croas · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara St Clair mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 61.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 57% of the time
#2 Doubles
57%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal