Search

Jeffrey Gromny

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
128 matches · 70W–58L · seasons 20192025
Where Jeffrey sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Jeffrey is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jeffrey has been 3.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jeffrey has gone from the 70th to the 45th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
64.9%
63W–34L · 56.8% of games
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 47.8% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 28.8% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 38.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history128 matches
W
Justin Hseih / Mark Tobello
2025-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremie Moll
0.001about as expected — took 57% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Abraham Taylor / Erich Moxley
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Michalski
0.044below expectation — took 33% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Samuel Cox / Scott Kreit
2025-09-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John McCann
0.013about as expected — took 48% of games against 53% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Stu Engs / Colin Haas
2025-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremie Moll
0.012below expectation — took 44% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Roger Martinez / Darwin Telada
2025-09-02 · #2 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Villani
+0.022better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Timothy Lee / Tam Vu
2025-08-26 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Gromny
0.048below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Robert Martin / George Mulopulos
2025-08-19 · #3 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Avino
+0.043better than expected — took 54% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Charles Jones / Brady Stevens
2025-08-12 · #2 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Gromny
0.027below expectation — took 55% of games against 64% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Darwin Telada / Markus Gonsalves
2025-07-29 · #2 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Gromny
+0.065better than expected — took 80% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Steve Horton / Chuck Creme
2025-07-08 · #2 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Gromny
+0.005better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Shane Harley / Jasper Kim
2025-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Trexler
0.063below expectation — took 33% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Thomas Waite / Sandy Mann
2025-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Trexler
+0.011better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.