Search

Chuck Creme

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
125 matches · 45W–80L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.17
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
107 of 139
NV · 3.5
178 of 228

Chuck is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chuck has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Chuck has gone from the 70th to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
46.2%
42W–49L · 49.7% of games
4.0
7.4%
2W–25L · 31.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history125 matches
L
Adam Austin / Dean Elyacoubi
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alvin Sabas
0.010about as expected — took 43% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Gary Roeben / Robert Carlson
2026-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Slayter
0.003below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Michael Miller / William Feast
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Slayter
0.009about as expected — took 42% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
N/A
2025-12-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Horton
0.012better than expected — took 100% of games against 87% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Kevin O'Hara / Steven McCrary
2025-12-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Haas
0.002about as expected — took 40% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-11-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Cimber
+0.015better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Adam Austin / James Nassar
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Haas
+0.014better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
COLE BOREN / Ed McDougall
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stu Engs
+0.029better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Luiz Padua / John To
2025-08-26 · #3 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Trexler
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Michael Villani / Robert Hau
2025-08-12 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Cimber
+0.007below expectation — took 14% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Jim Ray / Christopher Madsen
2025-07-29 · #2 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Wade Richardson
+0.031about as expected — took 29% of games against 25% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Carlos Aguirre / Tam Vu
2025-07-15 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Stevens
0.012below expectation — took 32% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.