← Search

Jane Ott

— year-end
20 matches · 6W–14L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Jane Ott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
L
2021-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Flanagin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2021-03-21 · CDTA 18&O W/E 3.5W Centennial Pollack Fri 7:30 $20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Agnieszka Fijol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2021-03-07 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-5
L
Diane Egan / Karen Siegel
2021-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alicia Arrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2021-01-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Agnieszka Fijol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2020-10-09 · CDTA 18&O W/E 3.5W Centennial Pollack Fri 7:30 $20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Dillon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2020-09-25 · CDTA 18&O W/E 3.5W Centennial Pollack Fri 7:30 $20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Yule
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2020-01-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Svetlana Kanev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2019-11-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Janke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-3
W
Michelle Leuchtner / Sharon Yagoda
2019-10-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Pollack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2019-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Edidin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2019-07-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Timmerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
30%
6W–14L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 60% of the time
#2 Doubles
60%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova