← Search

James Werst

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
19 matches · 13W–6L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history19 matches
W
2026-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Trach championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-13 · CPD/- 8.0 Men - Stauffer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Trach
loading the estimate
6-0
W
2026-09-13 · CPD/- 8.0 Men - Stauffer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Trach
loading the estimate
6-2
W
2026-07-25 · CPD · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jerry Beck
loading the estimate
6-2
W
2026-07-25 · CPD · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jerry Beck
loading the estimate
6-3
L
2026-07-25 · CPD · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Don Hutchison
loading the estimate
4-6
L
Jay Morgan / Bruce Thornquist
2026-02-15 · CPD - Stauffer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Schlosser championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-10 · CPD - Stauffer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas White
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-08-09 · CPD - Stauffer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas White
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-10-27 · RCW- Davis/Ankeny · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Carrie Moyer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2023-10-06 · RCW- Davis/Ankeny · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Ankeny mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-12-10 · RCW - Davis/Ankeny · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Ankeny mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 57.5% of games
9.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
3 matches
Singles
16%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer