← Search

Nancy Malatesta

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, DE
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
20 matches · 9W–11L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history20 matches
W
2026-05-04 · Baseline Babes · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Newcomb
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-05-13 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Blackburn
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2022-06-13 · 40 Love · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Holt
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2022-04-25 · Miller Time Too · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Holt
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2021-08-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Poley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2021-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Polly Cherundolo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2021-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Heizer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2021-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Bennett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2019-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Polly Cherundolo
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2019-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Say
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2019-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carole Crowe
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2019-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Corie Walker
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.3% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 35.2% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal