← Search

Lynda Harrington

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pembroke Pines, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 11W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history41 matches
L
2026-10-17 · MissionBay/Levine · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Consigli
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-10 · MissionBay/Levine · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexandra Santoro
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-08 · Loren/Levine · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ellen Raskin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-01-31 · Loren/Levine · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ellen Raskin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-01-25 · Loren/Levine · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ellen Raskin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2023-03-03 · Veltri - Jill · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Deborah Rhodes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-02-24 · Veltri - Jill · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Theresa Crosno
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-02-03 · Veltri - Jill · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Karen Novick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-01-27 · Veltri - Jill · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Karen Novick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2022-03-18 · Sunrise - Raskin · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christine Holcomb
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2022-03-11 · Sunrise - Raskin · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Karen Novick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2022-03-04 · Sunrise - Raskin · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christine Holcomb
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 35.7% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.9% of games
8.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 44.1% of games
9.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams