Search

Guy Neal

BEND, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
49 matches · 25W–24L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
BEND · 3.5
4 of 6
OR · 3.5
395 of 735

Guy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Guy has gone from the 91st to the 60th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 28.2% of games
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 60.3% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
L
Claudia Hamilton / Eric Walkingshawmixedchamps
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · with Helen Silfven
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Clayton Havens / Brandy Cervantesmixed
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Silfven
+0.000below expectation — took 56% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
Courtney Hohenlohe Langenburg / Christopher Kamkarmixed
2025-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Silfven
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Jennifer Snelling / Derek Snellingmixed
2025-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Silfven
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jolene Neal
+0.000about as expected — took 65% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Aubree Nash / ROGER PLANTmixed
2024-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jolene Neal
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Glenn Berman / Gary Bowman
2024-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Parke
+0.016better than expected — took 67% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Clayton Havens / Michael Wing
2024-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Hertford
+0.019better than expected — took 62% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
John Follett / Ronald Bodeen
2024-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Hertford
+0.020better than expected — took 57% of games against 46% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
William Brown / Liam Rutherford
2024-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Perkins
+0.016about as expected — took 41% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Miguel Angel Trejo Romo / Thomas Iverson
2024-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Perkins
+0.025about as expected — took 29% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Jon Eschrich / Joseph Huynh
2024-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Baumgartner
+0.010about as expected — took 29% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.