← Search

Guy Neal

BEND, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 25W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Guy Neal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · with Helen Silfven championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-27 · ACB-Doubles Troubles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Silfven mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
Courtney Hohenlohe Langenburg / Christopher Kamkar
2025-09-26 · ACB-Doubles Troubles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Silfven mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-26 · ACB-Doubles Troubles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Silfven mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-07-20 · ACB-Neal · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jolene Neal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-07-19 · ACB-Neal · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jolene Neal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2024-06-09 · ACB-Anderson 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Parke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-05-19 · ACB-Anderson 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Hertford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2024-05-18 · ACB-Anderson 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Hertford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2024-04-21 · ACB-Anderson 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Perkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2024-04-20 · ACB-Anderson 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Perkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-14 · ACB-Anderson 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Baumgartner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 28.2% of games
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 60.3% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova