← Search

Alice Mariani

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Gratiot, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 5W–11L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history16 matches
L
2026-07-07 · PH-Higgins 55s 7.0 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Benedetti
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · PH-Higgins 55s 7.0 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Houle
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · PH-Higgins 55s 7.0 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Pitre
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · PH-Higgins 55s 7.0 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Benedetti
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-07-12 · 1PH-HIGGINS 35NW MO 40&O SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Watson
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-06-30 · 1PH-HIGGINS 35NW MO 40&O SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Watson
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-02 · 1PH-HIGGINS 35NW MO 40&O SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Watson
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-15 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Benedetti
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-01 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Rock
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-07-25 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Rock
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-18 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Watson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-7
L
2024-06-13 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Watson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 56% of the time
#2 Doubles
56%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
44%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer