← Search

Julie Rock

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Clyde, MI
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 4W–11L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history15 matches
W
2024-08-15 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Watson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
L
2024-08-01 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Mariani
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-07-25 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Mariani
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-18 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Rebryk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-07-11 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Benedetti
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-20 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Rebryk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-07-20 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O 70DW TH SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Watson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2023-07-13 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O 70DW TH SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rene Lichota
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2023-06-22 · 4PH-WATSON AD55&O 70DW TH SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rene Lichota
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-06-23 · 2PH-WATSON 70DW 55&O AD THURS SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Pitre
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2022-06-09 · 2PH-WATSON 70DW 55&O AD THURS SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Pitre
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2019-07-02 · 1PH-LATOSINSKY 40NW 18 TUES SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanne Gaines
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 39.5% of games
7.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 60% of the time
#2 Doubles
60%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King